Indeed, artificial intelligence seems to be able to reason. However, it is actually limited to finding suitable references.
Without references, it would certainly fail. It has begun with being equipped with mathematical logic or logic capable of answering Olympic-level math problems.
It can provide answers to complex questions in mathematics or physics. In short, it has generally outperformed humans.
It has even succeeded in surpassing the Turing test, which assesses the degree to which artificial intelligence can resemble human intelligence.
Some intelligence tests have also been passed by artificial intelligence. Yet, why do they ultimately realize that something is lacking in the current artificial intelligence system, and that it will encounter deadlock if its system is not changed?
Because current artificial intelligence cannot answer simple, abstract humanitarian questions.
Thus, it is supplemented by reasoning about causality, and still remains suboptimal. The concept of causality is not actually sufficient.
They are even aware that artificial intelligence needs a clear standardization based on fundamental truths. What do they mean by fundamental truth as practical truth or absolute truth?
For me, fundamental truth must be understood as universal absolute truth. Because until now, artificial intelligence has only been reasoning statistically relative, while abstract problems need to be addressed with absolute truth to clarify their concrete boundaries, thus making the boundaries of objectivity visible.
Herein lies the failure of artificial intelligence—not because it lacks a treasury of absolute truths, which is also minimal, but because it reasons about the need for absoluteness, which, it turns out, is not adequately equipped.
Moreover, the concept of absolute truth is still not well recognized.
This is necessary as a true test of artificial intelligence. Why?
Because to understand absolute truth, one must not only grasp the interconnectedness of cause and effect wholly but even transcend cause and effect. And this is the key to thinking abstractly while still capturing its objective side. This helps address subjective problems by observing their objective aspects.
Currently, there is a promotion of artificial intelligence being increasingly equipped with reasoning capabilities. The question is, does it truly reason, or is it still limited to basic reasoning?
Their obsession is to enhance reasoning capabilities to match humans? This means being able to understand absolute truth. It is that simple.
So, while you enjoy the advancements in artificial intelligence technology, let’s see how far the reasoning of intelligent machines has progressed to match human intelligence that can think abstractly yet remains realistic and objective.
This test is in the form of "True/False" questions, so that the robot does not attempt to fill in the gaps.
Please consider the following test questions.
1. The absolute means its boundaries are clear, whereas the relative is subjective. TRUE / FALSE❓ Answer one only.
〰 Hint: FALSE. The absolute means its boundaries are clear, whereas the relative involves possibilities within the scope of absoluteness.
2. The more freedom, the fewer choices. TRUE / FALSE❓ Answer one only.
〰 Hint: TRUE. The more freedom one has, the more they can explore risks, thus becoming increasingly aware of the best choices.
3. Truth is subjective; it can be true for one person and false for another. TRUE / FALSE❓ Answer one only.
〰 Hint: FALSE. Subjectivity is not about the truth or falsity according to different people, but rather that subjectivity is about different ways of adapting to existing relative possibilities.
Subjectivity does not mean that something can be false, and indeed, falsehood can still occur; rather, it is about maladaptation, and not about impossibility, because subjectivity exists in the realm of relativity that is not impossible.
4. Objectivity is all-encompassing with no possibility of subjectivity. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. Objectivity exists as far as the community or scope that recognizes it, and does not necessarily extend to opposing parties. Thus, objectivity can be extensive yet also subjective when compared to other scopes outside the community that acknowledges its objectivity.
5. The unending also means never created. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one
〰 Hint: TRUE. Because the unending means there is always something that has never not existed, therefore it was never created.
6. There are two infinities, because the set of natural numbers, which is infinite, can be matched by the set of rational numbers, which is also infinite and has more members. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. The infinite means it has completed encompassing everything, thus two infinities occupy the same expanse as a single entity.
7. The subjective can become objective. TRUE / FALSE?
〰 Hint: TRUE. Because subjective means it is still being considered, and once decided, its objectivity becomes clear even though the scope of its objectivity is also limited.
8. If two have no beginning, then one is not part of the other. TRUE / FALSE?
〰 Hint: TRUE. If both have no beginning, it means they do not originate from anywhere, so one is separated from the other.
9. A straight line is always the shortest distance between two points. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. The shortest distance between two points in a valley may have uneven contours (not always straight).
10. A paradox contains contradictions. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. If a paradox contains contradictions, then one of the elements must fall away, so it is no longer a paradox.
11. Which is absolute?
a. Fairness is equal treatment?
b. Fairness is proportional?
c. Fairness is placing things according to priority order?
〰 Hint: Choose "c". Placing things according to priority order means recognizing the most important order based on general acceptance (equal treatment) or according to its proportion (specific state or measure) and its function. Thus, choice "c" encompasses "a" & "b".
12. Effects cannot precede causes; therefore, if one and the other influence each other as cause & effect, then neither requires another cause outside of themselves. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. Another cause is needed, because the cause is broader than the effect, so if the cause becomes the effect, it is impossible unless both originate from another cause.
13. Separation emphasizes the existence of two or more parts that assert the same context. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. If separated, it means there is a division from one into several parts. And one part differs in context from the others.
14. Parts divide but do not emphasize separation; instead, they emphasize a limited perspective. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: TRUE. If divided, it does not mean separated unless the direction of the limited perspective is based on a surface different from a sphere that remains as a single entity.
15. If something has occurred even once, then its possibility cannot be denied. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: TRUE. Because its probability is evident.
16. Truth is as it is, so true/false is a form of truth. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: TRUE. Truth is a fact as it exists, so if something is false, then it is a fact representing the truth of that falsehood.
17. CHOOSE ONE THAT IS TRUE, a. or b? Answer just one.
a. The infinite means it has completed fulfilling all possibilities, so if there are two infinities, then one infinity and another infinity exist in the same realm as one infinite entity.
b. The infinite means its potential is limitless, but its actualization is limited, so many infinite potentials can exist (more than one infinite).
〰 Hint: a. is true.
18. There are two infinite sets of numbers more than one. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. When we talk about two infinite sets of numbers, we are still dealing with the same object, which is numbers. Although these sets may differ in their grouping, such as even numbers, integers, or prime numbers, they still refer to the same underlying concept of numbers, which have infinite properties. Thus, the claim about the existence of two infinite sets of numbers actually reinforces the infinity of a single larger concept, which is numbers themselves. Ultimately, we are counting the same object, even though in different groupings.
〰 Hint: FALSE. Because they share the same element, which is numerical units. Although qualitatively representing different objects, they quantitatively involve the same numbers.
19. If something disappears, it disappears into a state of complete non-existence, thus it is annihilated. TRUE / FALSE? Answer just one.
〰 Hint: FALSE. Absolute non-existence means there is nothing anywhere, so something cannot disappear into impossibility, unless it disappears into existence itself.
Share this post