INTELLECTUAL SINGULARITY
The Synergy of META + Philosophy
This article is related to the discussion on Substack about the proposal from Lance S. Bush .
Here is the website link…
{ … My research focuses on the the psychology of metaethics, metaphilosophy, and methodological issues in experimental philosophy. Most of my research centers on whether nonphilosophers are moral realists, and the implications these empirical findings have for philosophy. I am intensely skeptical of the methods employed in both mainstream philosophy and psychology, and a great deal of my work also centers on critiquing the methods typically employed in both fields.
I also run a blog and YouTube channel that focus on metaethics, metaphilosophy, and metascience. }
Regardless of whether my proposal aligns with his ideas, that's not an issue, but the historical trace of this proposal needs to be recorded as a general motivation as well.
It is true that philosophy challenges us to think more critically.
However, philosophy has tended to become abstract.
Similarly, mathematics tends to be rational.
Physics, too, is locked into probabilities without being able to see the side of absolute, universal truth.They all think in the realm of relativity, forgetting the absolute side of reality.
Singularity of Reasoning
Through the mission to explore absolute truth, these weaknesses (being overly rational, too abstract, too probabilistic) can be unified into a singularity of reasoning.
INTELLECTUAL BOND. Where the principle of absoluteness can serve as a unifying medium between any intellectual discipline (psychology, mathematics, biology, chemistry, or whatever else).
In the era of artificial intelligence & quantum physics, the approach of absoluteness must become an alternative in philosophy. Why?
Robots hallucinate because data tends to be statistical.
On the other side this has already been recognized by quantum physicists, who realize the need to understand beyond cause and effect due to their confusion in facing quantum states, which are difficult to approach with classical logic that tends to focus on cause and effect (relativity). Another side is needed: absoluteness.
For me, that is contemporary philosophy— not only rational but also realistic & universal.
And your idea will be effective through a public platform. The title could include concepts of PHILOSOPHY and also METAPHILOSOPHY.
This could be supported through donations to show seriousness and involve some academic philosophers while also not neglecting non-academic philosophers.
NEUTRALITY
A broad freedom of expression must be maintained but must remain neutral.No political orientation, no orientation towards power, no organizational orientation except as far as a community of thinkers who view things from the perspective of absoluteness.
Neutrality needs to be prioritized so that perspectives are fair and wide, allowing the viewpoint of absoluteness to be seen.It’s like observing an elephant not from up close, to avoid cognitive bias, but from a neutral distance, so we can approach an understanding of its full picture.
Workspace
The focus would be on resolving the polemics inherited from philosophy, then considering the practical side.
It would also involve participation in artificial intelligence prototype projects, not only respecting the intellectual value (copyright – patents) of participants but also continuing to provide meta-philosophical guidelines or solutions for the development of artificial intelligence.Additionally, hard work from various disciplines like mathematics, genetics, and others would be necessary to understand quantum dimensions.Collaboration between scientific disciplines.
YOUR IDEA IS INTERESTING BECAUSE IT TOUCHES ON THE FUNDAMENTAL SIDE OF HUMANITY. Since philosophy deals with the dimensions of humanity, metaphysics, and physics, the intellectual approach must also be reasonable, not confined to just one discipline.
Then, can it be limited to just intellectuality without involving spirituality? That’s up to you; it’s not an issue. But if it were to be confined to pure intellectuality without metaphysics, that’s fine.
AS LONG AS THE SINGULARITY IS ABSOLUTE. Then, from any direction, the universality of metaphysics and physics will become apparent.
And it’s up to those outside the community you propose to see what kind of contribution to absoluteness a unification of disciplines offers.
Contextual Conversion
They will judge for themselves where the singularity lies when the platform you create helps bridge misunderstandings between disciplines in viewing the universe and humanity, through efforts at contextual conversion, finding the common thread without forcing it (as it is).
THIS WILL CERTAINLY BECOME A CONSTRUCTIVE PLATFORM FOR WORLD THINKERS. A PHILOSOPHICAL & METAPHILOSOPHICAL PLATFORM.
It’s worldview foundation that "PHILOSOPHY IS ABOUT EXPLORING ABSOLUTE TRUTH & APPLYING IT CONTEXTUALLY."
What do you think of my suggestion? Could you even be one of its founders? I would just be participating from the side of METAPhilosophy