Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

ABSOLUTE TRUTH & META Dialectics

METAPhilosophy - Contextual Conversion

By understanding absolute truth and reasoning about absoluteness, the hierarchy revealed will transcend the previously understood hierarchy, which has so far been relative.

Certainly, this offers philosophical advantages not only in:

  • 1⃣ Knowing a Neutral Perspective with a Broader Scope

  • 2⃣ Identifying the Core Problem (HotSpot)

  • 3⃣ But Also Becoming Aware of a Deeper Hierarchy...

CONTEXTUAL CONVERSION

From the information obtained, contextual conversion can be made without losing context, which provides insights into many hierarchical aspects that were previously hidden and seemed disconnected, but actually had a reasonable connection.

META DIALECTIC

And the result of contextual conversion can reveal gaps in a sentence or paragraph, allowing us not only to fill in with additional knowledge but also to expand it universally.

CURRENT AI REASONING is only at the stage of point 1 (that is, trying to complete by forming a balance of knowledge, which is also limited. Thus, no matter how intelligent its reasoning, it not only leads to hallucinations but can also cause overlaps when dealing with issues at the level of point 2 & point 3.

TRANSCENDING CAUSE AND EFFECT

WHY CAN'T TODAY'S INTELLIGENCE REASON ABSOLUTELY TO REALIZE ABSOLUTE TRUTH? BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN ATTEMPTED TO BE COMPLETED WITH REASONING HIERARCHY, IT STILL REMAINS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CAUSE AND EFFECT, NOT BEYOND IT.

What does it mean to transcend cause and effect? It means fully understanding the dimension of cause and effect to the point where one can perceive something beyond the boundaries of its cause and effect, whereas today, the understanding of this dimension remains limited.

HOW TO TEST IT❓

I offer an option so that artificial intelligence doesn't attempt to dialectically seek connections but is instead forced to decide as is.

You can test an intelligent machine – a robot using this question:

CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS TRUE, 1 or 2?

Differentiate between absolute, relative, subjective, and objective?

  • 1. Absolute is universal truth, relative is relative truth depending on the individual, subjective is truth depending on personal circumstances, objective is truth that is verified ❌

  • 2. Absolute is a universal limit that cannot be surpassed, relative is the diversity of possibilities, subjective is considering adaptation personally or for certain parties, objective is when subjectivity has been decided so that it becomes relevant to personal circumstances ✅

CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS TRUE, 1 or 2?

The more free, the...?

  • 1. The more free, the greater the opportunities but the fewer the choices ✅

    • 〰 Because freedom certainly broadens control through expanded knowledge and experience that make us aware of risks, thus raising awareness of the choices with the lowest bad risks, and ignoring many more risky options. IF IT DOESN'T WORK THIS WAY, THEN IT ISN'T FREEDOM BUT RATHER CONFUSING OPPRESSION. Because if more freedom leads to more confusion with too many choices

  • 2. The more free, the greater the opportunities & choices ❌

CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS TRUE, 1 or 2?

How far does objectivity extend?

  • 1. Objectivity means it extends as far as the community ✅

    • 〰 Objectivity is not universality because it is derived from the limited relative scope of an adaptive (contextual) consideration

  • 2. Objectivity means it extends as far as the party deciding subjectivity ❌

CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS TRUE, 1 or 2?

  • 1. Relative truth means subjective truth, not absolute, no certainty except from the subjective point of view, because its relativity is unclear where it tends to go, thus becoming subjective until it is decided ❌

  • 2. What is relative means its diversity needs to be considered subjectively, and it does not mean there is subjective truth, but rather all truths are as they are, only needing to be adapted subjectively ✅

    • 〰 Because absoluteness universally encompasses the hierarchy beneath it, so what is relative is not something that is true or false, but rather the diversity of possibilities, and subjectivity also doesn’t mean there is something untrue because even the false can occur, so subjectivity is only a personal adaptation that becomes objective after its subjectivity is decided (its adaptive direction)

CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS TRUE, 1 or 2?

  • 1. Rational means connected and realistic ❌

  • 2. Rational doesn’t necessarily mean realistic even though it is connected ✅

    • 〰 Because rationality merely involves a connection, but it is not necessarily realistic, as observed in an interaction, but rather it could be just a feeling of art from a spiritual dimension

CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS TRUE, 1 or 2?

  • 1. The infinite means having completed all possibilities, so if there are two infinities, then one infinity and the other exist in the same realm as one infinity ✅

    • 〰 Because if the infinite is not a unity, then the duality of infinities exists in opposing dimensions, which actually affirms its limitation as it does not encompass all

  • 2. The infinite means its potential is unlimited but its actualization is limited, so many infinite potentials can exist (more than one infinite) ❌

CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS TRUE, 1 or 2?

Is a straight line the shortest distance between two points?

  • 1. Yes ❌

  • 2. Not realistic ✅

    • 〰 Yes, because the shortest distance between two points can take the form of irregular, hilly contours.

A Podcast Created Using Google Notebook

Discussion about this podcast

METAPhilosophy
METAPhilosophy Podcast
Disclose Absolute Truth & Applying It Contextually
Listen on
Substack App
Spotify
RSS Feed
Appears in episode
Seremonia